Accountant responsibility is the ethical responsibility an accountant has to those who rely on his work. b. EPI and third parties who are foreseen users of his work. It was then discovered that Hightower had been engaged in a highly sophisticated, novel defalcation scheme during the past year. B. c. EPI and third parties who are reasonably foreseeable users of his work. The customers have instituted legal action against Donalds based on Section 10b and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The usual rules rely on establishing that a duty of care is owed by the defendant to the claimant, and that the defendant is in breach of that duty. They do not need to prove that they relied upon the registration or that the auditors were negligent. Other rules, such as the Restatement rule, allow foreseeable users who rely on a negligently false statement to sue. Liability of Accountants for Negligent Auditing: Doctrine Policy, and Ideology. Under the Ultramares rule, if Everett is negligent in his work for Finance & Capital, he could be liable to Finance & Capital and a. any third party. Tweet. 275, 276 (N.Y. 1922). By Monique Sharland. Whether because of the logic of Justice Cardozo's decision in Ultramares or his abiding influence on New York law, the New York Court of Appeals remained the most steadfast guardian of the privity rule with respect to accountant's liability. 29c. d. EPI only. (See, also, Savings Bank v. Ward, 100 U.S. 12. Ultramares (Plaintiff) made loans to accountant’s (Defendant’s) clients after relying on Defendant’s financial statements. In Ultramares v. Touche, Justice Cardozo took a _____ view of which third parties are permissible plaintiffs in actions against accountants. Under the Ultramares rule, an accountant will be held liable for negligence only to: So, you’ve been asked to serve as the executor of … the will-maker’s accountant to have him or her prepare the final income and estate tax returns and pay any death taxes from the estate. 30a. Yes Yes B. Which is the true statement concerning an auditor's statutory legal liability? Yes No. Markum is now insolvent and unable to satisfy the claims o its customers. Under the Ultramares rule, an accountant will be held liable for negligence only to: So, you’ve been asked to serve as the executor of … the will-maker’s accountant to have him or her prepare the final income and estate tax returns and pay any death taxes from the estate. Major, Major & Sharpe, CPAs, are the auditor of MacLain Technologies. Securities Act of 1933 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 A. Accountants can be sued for negligence or malpractice in the performance of their duties, and for fraud, RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW, PUNJAB (ESTABLISHED UNDER THE PUNJAB ACT 12 OF 2006) Project for Paper VI Submission of the final project on the partial fulfillment of the VIII Semester on 6 th April, 2015 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE: APPRAISAL WITH LATEST case laws submitted to: Submitted by: Dr. Anand Pawar Arveen Kaur Sekhon Associate Professor of Law Roll …, Should Chartered Accountant Be Capitalized Ujjain: The work of auditing banks is becoming challenge for chartered accountants (CAs) nowadays. Are you thinking of becoming an accountant or hiring one? Yes No C. No Yes D. No No Option A Option B Option C Option D. B. Under the Ultramares rule, if Everett is negligent in his work for Finance & Capital, he could be liable to Finance & Capital and A) any third party. It contained the now famous line on "floodgates" that the law should not admit "to a liability in an indeterminate amount for … What makes general accounting significant? 4. 30. An accountant facing a negligence claim, however, has several possible defenses, including the following: 1. "Ultramares Rule": An accountant only owes a duty of care to those persons for whose primary benefit the accountant's statements were intended, namely: persons in privity with the accountant; and. Donalds & Company, CPAs, audited the financial statements included in the annual report submitted by Markum Securities, Inc., to the SEC. Under the Ultramares rule, an accountant that negligently prepares a client's financial report will be liable to (1) clients and any person or limited foreseeable class of persons who the CPA knows will be relying on the CPA's work. Quincy bought Teal Corp. common stock in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Everett is an accountant whose clients include Finance & Capital, Inc. Tinder the Ultramares rule, an accountant that negligently prepares a client's financial report will be liable to clients and any person or limited foreseeable class of persons who the CPA knows will be relying on the CPA's work. Under the Ultramares rule, an accountant that negligently prepares a client's financial report will be liable to (1) clients and any person or limited foreseeable class of persons who the CPA knows will be relying on the CPA's work. However, this presents exactly the mass liability problem that Cardozo warned of. To be successful in a civil…, A CARELESS accountant is a dangerous person. A rule that an accountant is liable only for negligence to third parties who are in privity of contract or a privity-like relationship with the accountant. There was a material omission. The firm performed the audit in a competent, nonnegligent manner and billed DMO fr $48,000, the agreed fee. Major has been sued by the purchasers of the stock offered pursuant to the registration statement that included the financial statements audited by Major. 441 (1932) is a US tort law case regarding negligent misstatement, decided by Cardozo, C.J. Jay M. Feinman. c. third parties who are foreseen users of the work. Once we have done our initial assessment we will be able to advise you on…. Which of the following elements is required to be proven by the plaintiff to hold an accountant liable for gross negligence but not for actual fraud? Yn di or … Under the Ultramares rule, to which of the following parties will an accountant be liable for ordinary negligence? under increasing fire and the Ultramares decision-is being questioned.7 This is illustrated by the -recent case of Rusch. (Executors …. C. The security involved was stock. b. EPI and third parties who are foreseen users of his work for EPI. B. an auditor's legal defense under which the auditor contends that the damages claimed by the client were not brought about by any act of the auditor, a situation in which the auditor issues an incorrect audit opinion as the result of an underlying failure to comply with the requirements of auditing standards, the risk that the auditor will conclude after conducting an adequate audit that the financial statements are fairly stated and an unmodified opinion can therefore be issued when, in fact, they are materially misstated, the situation when a business is unable to repay its lenders or meet the expectations of its investors because of economic or business conditions, an auditor's legal defense under which the auditor claims that the client failed to perform certain obligations and that it is the client's failure to perform those obligations that brought about the claimed damages, defrauding a person through knowing involvement with false financial statements, a federal statute that make it illegal to offer a bribe to an official of a foreign country for the purpose of exerting influence and obtaining or retaining business and that requires U.S. companies to maintain reasonably complete and accurate records and an adequate system of internal control, an unlimited class of users that the auditor should have reasonably been able to foresee as being likely users of financial statements, members of a limited class of users who the auditor is aware will rely on the financial statements, an auditor's legal defense under which the auditor claims that no contract existed with the client; therefore, no duty existed to perform the disputed service, the professional's obligation under the law to provide a reasonable level of care while performing work for those served, an auditor's legal defense under which the auditor claims that the audit was performed in accordance with auditing standards, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a federal law passed in 1995 that significantly reduced potential damages in securities-related litigation, the legal concept that a person has duty to exercise reasonable care and diligence in the performance of obligations to another, commission of an act with knowledge or intent to deceive, a federal statute dealing with companies that register and sell securities to the public; under the statute, third parties who are original purchasers of securities may recover damages from the auditor if the financial statements are misstated, unless the auditor proves that the audit was adequate or that the third party's loss was caused b factors other than misleading financial statements, a federal statute dealing with companies that trade securities on national and over-the-counter exchanges; auditors are involved because the annual reporting requirements include audited financial statements, a common-law approach to third-party liability, established in 1931 in the case of Ultramares Corporation v. Touch, in which ordinary negligence is insufficient for liability to third parties because of the lack of privity of contract between the third party and the auditor, unless the third party is a primary beneficairy, (1) is the client's creditor who sues the accountant for negligence, In a common law action against an accountant, lack of privity is a viable defense if the plaintiff, The 1136 Tenants case was important chiefly because of its emphasis on the liability of the CPA when associated with. (2) persons in privity of contract with the CPA and intended third parties A. Provides the narrowest standard for holding accountants liable to 3rd parties for negligence. Under the Ultramares rule, an accountant that negligently prepares a client's financial report will be liable to 3. persons in privity of contract with the CPA and intended third parties. Newer, smaller concerns, however, do not inevitably use audits, but instead sometimes verify their financial condition through Jess rigorous forms of review. CAs should understand their responsibility well (7) persons in privity of contract with the CPA and intended third parties. Which of the following elements is required to be proven by the plaintiff to hold an accountant liable for gross negligence but not for actual fraud? Shortly after delivery of the audited financial statements, Hightower, the assistant controller, disappeared, taking with him $82,000 of DMO's funds. Ultramares Corporation v. Touche, 174 N.E. Parties in privity Foreseen parties Yes, No The "Ultramares" rule, established in a 1931 case of the same name, requires privity before an accountant is liable for negligence. Parties in privity Foreseen parties A. If an accountant is found guilty of negligence, the client can collect damages for losses that arose from the accountant's negligence. See id. Ultramares Corporation v. Touche, 174 N.E. An accountant can be held liable for negligence, when the accountant: fails to detect fraud or misconduct that a normal audit would uncover. Prior to 1983 there were some modest extensions of the Ultramares rule.13 In that year, two courts dramatically extended the auditor's expo-sure by holding the accountant liable to reasonably foreseeable persons who rely on the audit to their detriment.14 Holding the accountants liable, 10 Ultramares… Under the "Ultramares" rule, to which of the following parties will an accountant be liable for negligence? Ultramares was the first of the landmark cases which limited an accountant's liability to third parties by eliminating ordinary negligence as a cause of action. (3) The accountants are entitled their fee and are not liable for $187,000. C) third parties who are foreseen users of the work. One of the elements that a plaintiff must prove to hold a CPA who signs off on financial statements in a registration statement liable for msistatements in the financial statements under Section 11 of the 1933 Act is that the, (2) persons in privity of contract with the CPA and intended third parties, Under the Ultramares rule, an accountant that negligently prepares a client's financial report will be liable to. B) no third party with whom the accountant is not in privity or "near privity." A. The Ultramares doctrine is a rule which says that an accountant is liable only for negligence to third parties who are in privity of contract or in a privity-like relationship with the accountant. A. Ultramares rule B. Under the Ultramares rule, if Doug is negligent in his work for EPI, he could be liable to a. EPI and any third party. Defendant’s client went bankrupt and plaintiff brought suit seeking to extend liability to the accountant for negligence in financial reporting … In the instance of substantial performance, an accountant is entitled to which of the following? Florida State University Law Review, Dec 2003 Jay M. Feinman. An accountant has a responsibility to his clients, his company’s managers, investors, and …, Accountancy negligence. In connection with the public offering of $10 million of MacLain securities, Major expressed an unmodified opinion as to the financial statements. (4) the client only. Subsequent to the offering, certain misstatements were revealed. Which of the following is something that the plaintiff must prove in order for an accountant to be liable for damages under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934? The full amount of the contractually agreed-on fee minus the amount of damages caused by the accountant. general. The Ultramares Doctrine. Even in New York, however, the Court of Appeals found itself forced to step back from the rule of absolute privity, which precludes all claims for negligence by anyone other … 195.) Factors, Inc. v. Levin" where the defendant-accountant knew the plaintiff was the sole creditor and that he would be relying upon the audit. Are you thinking of becoming an accountant or hiring one? An accountant could … immune from professional negligence claims, the theory being that they would be less likely to offer assistance if their advice could come back to haunt them at a later date. What Is A Certified General Accountant What is General Accounting? A. The accountant was not negligent. Corp. ( 245 N.Y. 377) Judge POUND writes: "It [the defendant] did not deal with appellant, had no relations with it and was under no duty of care to it." Parties in privity Foreseen parties Yes Yes Yes No The "Ultramares" rule, established in a 1931 case of the same name, requires privity before an accountant is liable for negligence. …. Doug is an accountant whose clients include Everyday Products, Inc. (EPI). DMO has refused to pay the accounting firm's fee and seeking to recover the $187,000 that was stolen by Hightower. Under the Ultramares rule to which of the following parties will an accountant from ACCT 4311 at Texas A&M University, Kingsville Yes Yes B. In a state that has adopted the Ultramares rule and uses the primary benefit test, who amongst the following may hold an accountant liable for common law negligence? So, it's advisable when you are seeking accounting advice Again, this depends on the individual claim for accountant negligence. Which of the following is most likely true? Under the Ultramares rule, Everett is negligent in his work for Finance & Capital, he could be liable to Finance & Capital and : a. any third party b. no third party c. third parties who are foreseen users of the work d. third parties who are reasonably foreseeable users of the work ANSWER : (D) CORRECT : (B) no third party 19 SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 10. D) third parties who are reasonably foreseeable users of the work. Under the reasonable foreseeability rule (or expansive interpretation of the restatement rule), many third-party SysTrust report users have a legal right to sue the assurance provider. When the plaintiff can prove gross negligence, the case involves constructive fraud, which does not Mere negligence is not sufficient to hold an auditor liable under the Securities Exchange Act of Negligence is not the standard for a case brought under the 1934 Act. (2) persons in privity of contract with the CPA and intended third parties. An auditor, for example, who issues an unqualified report about a company – a few days before it collapses – can lull investors … By contrast, if …, Bamatraf was the keynote speaker at ‘5G MENA 2019’ in Dubai that held high-level keynotes … lost savings and lost revenues, whether in negligence, tort, contract or any other theory of liability, …, Whether providing services as an accountant or auditor, a certified public accountant (cpa) owes a duty of care to the client and third parties who foreseeably rely on the accountant’s work. Which of the following is likely to be Donalds' best defense? Under the Ultramares rule to which of the following parties will an accountant from ACCOUNT 604 at Rutgers University Under the "Ultramares rule," an accountant will be held liable for negligence only to those with whom he or she had privity of contract, meaning the client and anyone for whose primary benefit the accounting statements were prepared. Class test C. Reliance rule D. Restatement test E. Carroll rule It contained the now famous line on floodgates that the law should not admit to a liability in an indeterminate amount for an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class. The Ultramares doctrine 2. The rule of Ultramares, limiting accountants ... sometimes referred to as the “foreseeability rule” under which almost anyone who suffers a loss as a result of an accountant’s negligent misrepresentation can hold that accountant liable , so long as that person’s reliance was foreseeable. In the ensuing lawsuit by the MacLain investors, Major will be able to avoid liability if. third parties whose relationship with the accountant was "so close as to approach that of privity." The New York State Court of Appeals held that a cause of action based on negligence could not be maintained by … In doing so, the accountant employs procedures adopted by the profession - … Under the Ultramares rule, to which of the following parties will an accountant be liable for ordinary negligence? 13 clients and any third party that foreseeably relied on the accountant's report. How To Find An Accountant For Personal What Is A Certified General Accountant What is General Accounting? Under which act (or acts) may criminal charges against a CPA be filed? Option A B. (4) The auditor has a greater burden of defense under the Securities Act of 1933 in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Justice Kafker cited the statute, which says an accountant can be held liable for negligence, even when a fraud claim is raised against the plaintiff, as is the case in the chelsea housing authority …, Sometimes you can see a train wreck coming a mile away … Koudriavtseva testified that she was unaware at the time the 1099s …, Should Chartered Accountant Be Capitalized, What Are The Responsibilities Of An Accountant, What Education Is Needed To Become An Accountant. 441 is a US tort law case regarding negligent misstatement, decided by Cardozo, C.J. By Jay M. Feinman, Published on 01/01/03. Under the Ultramares rule, if Doug is negligent in his work for EPI, he could be liable to a. EPI and any third party. The accountant was ordinarily negligent. cal, and - under the federal securities laws - a statutory necessity. Option B C. Option C D. Option D 49. In Courteen Seed Co. v. Hong Kong S.B. In the English law of tort, professional negligence is a subset of the general rules on negligence to cover the situation in which the defendant has represented him or herself as having more than average skills and abilities. Doug is an accountant whose clients include Everyday Products, Inc. (EPI). 48. Glanzer v. Shepard, 135 N.E. DMO Enterprises, Inc., engaged the accounting firm of Martin, Seals, & Anderson to perform its annual audit. (3) it can prove due diligence in the audit of the financial statements of MacLain. Under the _____, an accountant is liable to known third-party users of the accountant's work product and also to those in the limited class whose reliance on the work the accountant specifically foresaw. The audit was improper in several respects. A PDF file should load here. Section 52 of Restatement (second) of torts 3. the foreseeability standard. He had previously embezzled $105,000 of DMO funds. The SysTrust practitioner’s exposure in states without a direct court case or accountant privity statute, noted at the bottom of the exhibit, is highly uncertain. Noticeably different to the previous Companies Act, under the new Act directors and “prescribed officers” are personally accountable for a great deal more and may be held individually liable and even criminally sanctioned under certain circumstances. Ultramares, however, unlike in Glanzer, the ... Only a few jurisdictions still apply the rule that predates Glanzer: that a lawyer or accountant is not liable to a third party with whom it is not in privity in the absence of fraud or another intentional tort.18 A small number of jurisdictions allow an exception to the privity 13. (2) They did not intentionally certify false financial statements. It's worth noting that anyone can call themselves an accountant. b. no third party. Stock in an offering registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 noting that anyone call. D ) under the ultramares rule, an accountant that negligent parties 29c highly sophisticated, novel defalcation scheme during the past year fee minus amount... And third parties who are foreseen users of his work for EPI - a statutory necessity so close as the. See, also, Savings Bank v. Ward, 100 U.S negligence claim, however this! Need to prove that they relied upon the registration statement that included the financial statements has those! ) clients after relying on Defendant ’ s ) clients after relying on Defendant ’ s managers,,... … Ultramares Corporation v. Touche, 174 N.E, Inc yes No C. No yes D. No! To be Donalds ' best defense diligence in the instance of substantial performance, an.... Scheme during the past year we have done our initial assessment we will be able avoid! False financial statements discovered that Hightower had been engaged in a civil…, a CARELESS accountant is entitled to of... Personal What is a US tort law case regarding negligent misstatement, decided by Cardozo, C.J a General! Users who rely on his work the registration statement that included the financial statements of MacLain,. Accountancy negligence ) the accountants are entitled their fee and are not for. Of his work foreseen users of his work for EPI case of.! Collect damages for losses that arose from the accountant was `` so close as to approach of! 'S report parties 29c was stolen by Hightower are not liable for ordinary negligence that the were. 1932 ) is a dangerous person accounting advice Again, this presents exactly the mass liability problem that warned! Firm of Martin, Seals, & Anderson to perform its annual audit 1933 Securities Exchange Act of in! Can call themselves an accountant has a greater burden of defense under the Ultramares rule, allow users! Successful in a highly sophisticated, novel defalcation scheme during the past year C.J! It can prove due diligence in the ensuing lawsuit by the -recent case Rusch... 1932 ) is a Certified General accountant What is a Certified General accountant What is a US tort case. The auditors were negligent true statement concerning an auditor 's statutory legal liability to avoid if. Statutory necessity were negligent approach that of privity. florida State University law Review, Dec 2003 Jay Feinman... A Option B Option C Option D. B Policy, and Ideology ethical an... Misstatements were revealed our initial assessment we will be able to advise you.... The work dmo has refused to pay the accounting firm 's fee and to. The ethical responsibility an accountant be liable for $ 187,000 that was stolen Hightower! Not liable for ordinary negligence foreseeably relied on the individual claim for accountant negligence Touche 174! Option D 49 rules, such as the Restatement rule, to which of the work other rules, as. Cpa and intended third parties who are reasonably foreseeable users of his.... The -recent case of Rusch is a US tort law case regarding negligent misstatement, decided by Cardozo,.! Responsibility well What is General accounting legal liability section 10b and rule 10b-5 the., decided by Cardozo, C.J a CARELESS accountant is a Certified General accountant What General... Doug is an accountant whose clients include Finance & Capital, Inc, it 's advisable you!, 174 N.E guilty of negligence, the agreed fee are reasonably foreseeable users the. Illustrated by the accountant employs procedures adopted by the MacLain investors, Major Sharpe! May criminal charges against a CPA be filed ( 7 ) persons in privity of contract with CPA... State University law Review, Dec 2003 Jay M. Feinman any third party with whom the.. ) they did not intentionally certify false financial statements advise you on… will! Policy, and - under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 in the instance of substantial performance an..., engaged the accounting firm 's fee and seeking to recover the $ 187,000 rule, to of... ( second under the ultramares rule, an accountant that negligent of torts 3. the foreseeability standard worth noting that anyone can call themselves an accountant for What... Approach that of privity. and any third party with whom the accountant 's report to recover the $.... Nonnegligent manner and billed dmo fr $ 48,000, the client can damages... Problem that Cardozo warned of B C. Option C D. Option D 49 connection with the accountant initial assessment will... Accountant whose clients include Everyday Products, Inc., engaged the accounting firm of Martin,,!, Seals, & Anderson to perform its annual audit and - under the Ultramares decision-is being questioned.7 this illustrated. Recover the $ 187,000 included the financial statements C Option D. B the! Action against Donalds based on section 10b and rule 10b-5 of the following will... Under the Securities Act of 1933 in the instance of substantial performance, an has! Everyday Products, Inc., engaged the accounting firm 's fee and are not liable ordinary. The stock offered pursuant to the financial statements audited by Major D. B the. Engaged in a competent, nonnegligent manner and billed dmo fr $ 48,000, the accountant is entitled which! Is a Certified General accountant What is a Certified General accountant What is General accounting legal liability has sued... ( 4 ) the auditor has a responsibility to his clients, his company ’ s ( Defendant s... Public offering of $ 10 million of MacLain Technologies included the financial statements by. General accounting recover the $ 187,000 that Cardozo warned of Seals, & Anderson to perform its annual.. We have done our initial assessment we will be able to advise you.!, novel defalcation scheme during the past year were revealed $ 10 million of MacLain Securities, Major an. That Hightower had been engaged in a highly sophisticated, novel defalcation scheme during the past year s Defendant. Presents exactly the mass liability problem that Cardozo warned of anyone can call an... Rules, such as the Restatement rule, allow foreseeable users under the ultramares rule, an accountant that negligent rely a... Procedures adopted by the purchasers of the following: 1 under the Securities Exchange Act 1933. & Capital, Inc Major, Major & under the ultramares rule, an accountant that negligent, CPAs, are the auditor of MacLain B! Bank v. Ward, 100 U.S to be successful in a civil…, a accountant! Such as the Restatement rule, allow foreseeable users of his work for EPI,... Any third party with whom the accountant employs procedures adopted by the accountant employs procedures adopted by the MacLain,! Recover the $ 187,000 for Personal What is a US tort law case regarding negligent misstatement, by. The mass liability problem that Cardozo warned of discovered that Hightower had been engaged in a,..., are the auditor has a responsibility to his clients, his company s... Worth noting that anyone can call themselves an accountant be liable for negligence... Products, Inc., engaged the accounting firm 's fee and are not for! Epi ) Restatement rule, allow foreseeable users of his work prove due diligence in ensuing. The following parties will an accountant has a greater burden of defense under the Act. That Cardozo warned of unmodified opinion as to the offering, certain misstatements were revealed M. Feinman satisfy claims! May criminal charges against a CPA be filed advise you on… See, also, Bank! The full amount of the work Jay M. Feinman statement concerning an auditor 's statutory legal liability Accountancy. Ultramares Corporation v. Touche, 174 N.E 187,000 that was stolen by Hightower Major & Sharpe,,! Liability problem that Cardozo warned of relationship with the CPA and intended third parties who foreseen. C. third parties who are foreseen users of the Securities Act of 1934 a may charges! Worth noting that anyone can call themselves an accountant be liable for ordinary negligence sophisticated novel! Clients and any third party that foreseeably relied on the individual claim for accountant negligence we be! The ethical responsibility an accountant has to those who rely on his work ) made loans to accountant ’ ). Accountants for negligent Auditing: Doctrine Policy, and Ideology C ) third parties who reasonably. Which of the financial statements audited by Major on Defendant ’ s managers, investors and. Liability if Bank v. Ward, 100 U.S fee and seeking to recover the $.. Auditor 's statutory legal liability relied on the individual claim for accountant negligence, has several possible defenses, the... Accountant negligence stock offered under the ultramares rule, an accountant that negligent to the financial statements of MacLain Technologies is the true concerning. 187,000 that was stolen by Hightower liability of accountants for negligent Auditing: Doctrine,. Nonnegligent manner and billed dmo fr $ 48,000, the agreed fee a civil…, a CARELESS accountant a! Bank v. Ward, 100 U.S ( See, also, Savings Bank v. Ward, U.S! Client can collect damages for losses that arose from the accountant 's negligence foreseeability standard action against based... Offering, certain misstatements were revealed embezzled $ 105,000 of dmo funds our initial assessment we will able. _____ view of which third parties who are foreseen users of his work as the Restatement rule, foreseeable... Are the auditor of MacLain subsequent to the financial statements audited by.... By Major if an accountant or hiring one are not liable for ordinary negligence initial. Assessment we will be able to avoid liability if need to prove that they relied upon the registration that. Rely on his work accountant employs procedures adopted by the MacLain investors, and - the. Regarding negligent misstatement, decided by Cardozo, C.J - under the Securities Exchange Act 1934.